asterroc ([personal profile] asterroc) wrote2008-11-04 09:15 am

(no subject)

Scanning the various ballot measures listed by CNN, it turns out that Arkansas has a ballot initiative to prevent adoptions or fostering by unmarried couples - straight or gay. Glad to know they consider me an evil sinner too!

[identity profile] zandperl.livejournal.com 2008-11-04 08:50 pm (UTC)(link)
When I originally posted that comment my thought was "no civil unions whatsoever" - basically the state should have no stake whatsoever in the relationship between two individuals. However what prompted my comment to [livejournal.com profile] marquiswildbill was a previous comment elsewhere that my opinion regrading marriage changes every ten minutes.

While writing this, I find myself disliking the idea of individualized contracts for multiple reasons. For example some of us may be unwilling or unable to hire a lawyer to draw up an indivdualized contract - doing away with a standard contract but allowing individualized ones means that low-income people will be entirely unable to get any of the benefits of marriage, and I would be very against such discrimination. I also like the idea of having some standard contract so that for most people quick decisions can be made in emergency situations, for example a hospital knowing who can make medical decisions for a patient if s/he is brought in already unconscious.
rosefox: Green books on library shelves. (Default)

[personal profile] rosefox 2008-11-04 10:30 pm (UTC)(link)
You might be interested in [livejournal.com profile] karenbynight's post on the state's interest in marriage.

[identity profile] zandperl.livejournal.com 2008-11-04 10:44 pm (UTC)(link)
Thanks for that link, definitely interesting.