comma ([identity profile] q10.livejournal.com) wrote in [personal profile] asterroc 2009-05-11 04:58 am (UTC)

a few examples of cases where ‘world’ means universe:

1. in metaphysics and semantics, one sometimes talks about ‘possible worlds’ when defining notions of metaphysical necessity or discussing the kinds of alternative, unreal states of affairs that we think about when we think about possibilities and uncertainties. in these areas, nothing is special about planets - its very clear that most writers in these areas (David Lewis is a striking example) are using ‘possible world’ to mean ‘possible way that the totality of everything that is’ could be, which, in ordinary talk, is pretty close to ‘possible universe’.

2. similarly, in epistemology, writers often draw distinctions between one's own mind and the external world (that can only be perceived through the senses) - here again planets aren't special - looking up at the sky on a clear night is still taking in sensory impressions of the world.

3. in theological contexts, people frequently use ‘the world’ to mean ‘the sum of all creation’ - see e.g. Cat Faber's deist hymn The Word of God - when she writes ‘Humans wrote the Bible, God wrote the world.’, it's pretty clear she means the whole of natural reality, including at least the sky that was mentioned in a pervious verse.

4. i'm pretty sure the many worlds interpretation of QM isn't about planets being special.

Post a comment in response:

This account has disabled anonymous posting.
If you don't have an account you can create one now.
HTML doesn't work in the subject.
More info about formatting