asterroc ([personal profile] asterroc) wrote2010-01-05 09:51 pm
Entry tags:

Polyamory article from the Boston Globe

Apparently it was the frontpage article from the magazine. Thought some of you here in intertubespace would like to see it.

[identity profile] meig.livejournal.com 2010-01-06 03:08 am (UTC)(link)
I have had friends who have done this for years, but I could never, ever do this. I just fry with jealousy even *thinking* about Cj with another woman.

[identity profile] zandperl.livejournal.com 2010-01-06 03:14 pm (UTC)(link)
Poly isn't for me either. I prefer to spend my free time on things other than maintaining a billion relationships. :-P So long as my poly friends know not to hit on me though (and my mono single friends, and cheating friends too), I've no problem with them. :)

[identity profile] hrafn.livejournal.com 2010-01-06 03:18 am (UTC)(link)
The print edition had the charming bonus of cheesy cartoon illustrations of various relationship configurations - but that's about my only complaint about the piece. *looks at link again* Oh; I guess they showed that in the electronic version as well.
rosefox: Green books on library shelves. (Default)

[personal profile] rosefox 2010-01-06 03:32 am (UTC)(link)
It's always nice to see a thoughtful, respectful treatment, even if they do attribute the overlap between polyfolk and SF fans to the internet (where, um, no one but those two groups ever goes?) rather than shared traditions of questioning what Everyone Knows and looking for new ways to solve old problems.

[identity profile] zandperl.livejournal.com 2010-01-06 03:15 pm (UTC)(link)
I thought that was interesting. They attribute a lot of it to Heinlein's work as well.

[identity profile] jrtom.livejournal.com 2010-01-06 07:03 am (UTC)(link)
Not a bad article on poly. (Not particularly original, either, but I suppose that the more slice-of-life articles like this that show up in various places, the better.)

[identity profile] zandperl.livejournal.com 2010-01-06 03:16 pm (UTC)(link)
Yeah, I didn't think it said anything new other than perhaps that Boston is a hotbed of polyamory. But putting it in a mainstream paper like this, I think helps broaden minds.