well, it only seems to require that they take the pets into account, at least according to the article, does that mean it would be acceptable to have a multifaceted plan to distinguish between the cases where yo can save the pets, the cases where you leave the pets to fend for themselves, and the cases where you eat the pets? because i think knowing in advance which mode you're going to be in in any given disaster scenario would save everybody a lot of trouble.
![[personal profile]](https://www.dreamwidth.org/img/silk/identity/user.png)
timeasmymeasure
no subject
Date: 2006-05-23 08:06 am (UTC)