[personal profile] asterroc
Someone explain to me what half of these questions have to do with science.

Date: 2006-08-01 12:31 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] kadath.livejournal.com
That'd be "nothing."

Date: 2006-08-01 01:23 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] galbinus-caeli.livejournal.com
Well CNN seems to divide the world into four categories: Pop Culture, Politics, Religion, and the all else category, Science.

So, of course those are science questions.

Date: 2006-08-01 02:31 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] l0stmyrel1g10n.livejournal.com
i'd have thought the Pong question would be in Pop Culture...

Date: 2006-08-01 03:12 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] galbinus-caeli.livejournal.com
Naw, its more than two years old, which makes it history. History is a science, right?

Date: 2006-08-01 03:18 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] l0stmyrel1g10n.livejournal.com
most definitely no.

Date: 2006-08-01 04:29 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] q10.livejournal.com
it is puzzling.

Date: 2006-08-03 03:20 am (UTC)
From: [identity profile] blue102.livejournal.com
If I could explain that, I might possibly also be able to explain what CNN has to do with news. But that one confounds me too, so... you're on your own!

Date: 2006-08-03 04:41 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] zandperl.livejournal.com
Well, CNN's more newsy than, say, Fox... Not that it's saying much.

Date: 2006-08-03 04:44 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] zandperl.livejournal.com
History research however, does use the Scientific Method, although "experiment" for them takes the form of "read lots of manuscripts" or whatever.

Date: 2006-08-03 04:48 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] l0stmyrel1g10n.livejournal.com
and how do they know that whoever wrote those manuscripts used the Scientific Method? history is written by the winners, right? doesn't sound very scientific to me.

Date: 2006-08-03 05:27 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] zandperl.livejournal.com
When I said manuscripts I meant primary sources (things written by people at the event). In history, primary sources are like raw data to scientists. I suppose things written a generation later or something would be equivalent to scientists looking at other people's data and reinterpreting it. To remind you, the Scientific Method is

1) Observation/Question
2) Hypothesis (a guess at why it happens)
3) Prediction (what data / primary sources would I need to see to prove me right?)
4) Experiment (get data / primary sources)
5) Conclusion (do the data / primary sources compare with my prediction?)

Profile

asterroc

April 2017

S M T W T F S
      1
2345678
9101112131415
16171819202122
232425 26272829
30      

Most Popular Tags

Style Credit

Expand Cut Tags

No cut tags
Page generated Dec. 25th, 2025 03:05 pm
Powered by Dreamwidth Studios