For a timely chuckle,
Oct. 31st, 2006 11:56 pm![[personal profile]](https://www.dreamwidth.org/img/silk/identity/user.png){kind=small}
asterrocStambovsky v. Ackley (NY 1991)
Plaintiff sues defendant for selling him a house without disclosing the existence of a poltergeist on the premises. Whether the ghost actually exists or not is only briefly mentioned, and only in the dissent. The decision is full of bad puns (in addition to the obligatory legalese I don't entirely get).
(Thanks to "Foxtrot" for the link.)
Plaintiff sues defendant for selling him a house without disclosing the existence of a poltergeist on the premises. Whether the ghost actually exists or not is only briefly mentioned, and only in the dissent. The decision is full of bad puns (in addition to the obligatory legalese I don't entirely get).
(Thanks to "Foxtrot" for the link.)
