Date: 2007-06-19 04:47 pm (UTC)
I'm skeptical of the HIV claims. I am not skeptical of the smegma/hygeinic claims. It is the latter that I referred to when I said there were minor benefits. If it really did reduce the chance of contracting HIV I would call that a major benefit. In the light of only minor benefits, I would not do this elective surgery. Similarly, I'm sure removing the clitoral hood would help with female hygeine, but I wouldn't want to do that either. If I were convinced that circumcision prevented contraction of HIV 100% of the time, I'd be tempted to do it, but I'm still not sure that I would.
This account has disabled anonymous posting.
If you don't have an account you can create one now.
HTML doesn't work in the subject.
More info about formatting

Profile

asterroc

April 2017

S M T W T F S
      1
2345678
9101112131415
16171819202122
232425 26272829
30      

Most Popular Tags

Style Credit

Expand Cut Tags

No cut tags
Page generated Jul. 10th, 2025 03:49 pm
Powered by Dreamwidth Studios