Date: 2007-11-14 06:30 pm (UTC)
what kind of intervention are we talking about? will it be analogous to, say, the application of federal anti-discrimination laws to campuses? that's been problematic on occasion, but on the whole i think it's worked out alright.

sure, these people may think there's liberal bias at the universities, but that doesn't exclude the possibility that they're right on this issue (it doesn't exclude the possibility that they're right about liberal bias either, although even if they are, i suspect their big-picture cure is worse than the disease). the fact that somebody can spin protecting people's rights to assembly and speech as related to an entirely reprehensible proposal for content standards (which i'll admit is a risk) doesn't mean we shouldn't stop standing for people's rights - it means that we should try to promote public awareness an alternative picture that clearly separates these issues. people are being rather unwholesomely silenced at real universities right now, and, although i'm always nervous about federal intervention, it doesn't strike me as a terrible idea to set federal standards on, say, school disciplinary processes to try to discourage this kind of thing.

of course, i haven't read the rider. based on the name, it could be anywhere between completely reasonable and beyond absurd.
This account has disabled anonymous posting.
If you don't have an account you can create one now.
HTML doesn't work in the subject.
More info about formatting

Profile

asterroc

April 2017

S M T W T F S
      1
2345678
9101112131415
16171819202122
232425 26272829
30      

Most Popular Tags

Style Credit

Expand Cut Tags

No cut tags
Page generated Jan. 6th, 2026 07:03 am
Powered by Dreamwidth Studios