asterroc: (doll)
[personal profile] asterroc
There is a bill in the House right now called "H.R. 4137, The College Opportunity and Affordability Act of 2007." This bill is designed to help students access higher education, regardless of their financial situation. This is a highly laudable goal. Moreover, this specific bill reauthorizes a system already in place, and already proven to work reasonably well - sure not perfectly, but without the bill going through things would be MUCH worse.

However, there are people planning to tack on an "Academic Bill of Rights" amendment. At first glance this seems harmless - it's supposed to give students the right to free speech and congregation on campuses. Take another look at that. How long have our universities and colleges, both public and private, already been providing the right to free speech and meeting and even civil protests on our campuses without interference from the Feds? When problems come up, have we ever turned to the Feds for their so-called help? You know where else the Feds are sitting on our campuses? Behind tables saying "Join the Army - you'll only have to train two weekends a year and we promise, cross our hearts, that we won't send you to Iraq to be blown up! and we'll even take you if you're schizophrenic or retarded because we need more cannon fodder people who can't understand the situation they're in while on the front lines eager recruits who we can prey upon recruit because of their debt and help to become financially solvent!"

Yeah, I want them legislating for more Federal presence on my campus. Where do I sign up?

To send a letter to your Rep, here is where you sign up.

And in case you think I'm saying this just b/c I'm a flaming Liberal, quoted directly from the model letter on that page,

Over the last four years, 28 states have considered legislation aimed at correcting an alleged “political bias” at their state colleges and universities. After examining the evidence and assessing existing institutional policies, no state enacted this legislation, regardless of which party held a political majority.

Date: 2007-11-14 01:58 am (UTC)
From: [identity profile] oh-chris.livejournal.com
when i rule the world, adding riders to bills will be punishable by public flogging.

Date: 2007-11-14 06:21 am (UTC)
From: [identity profile] q10.livejournal.com
libertarians and conservatives frequently argue that we should distrust all federal programs in an area because a few federal programs they can point to have bee disasters. this is not a terribly compelling argument.

in addition, many universities, public and private, have been known to conspicuously fail to protect free speech, and even to actively suppress it, so the benefits of clearly articulated students rights are there, even if they are perhaps being exaggerated in this setting.

Date: 2007-11-14 02:33 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] dirkcjelli.livejournal.com
this reaffirms my view, formed over the last seven years, that Massachusetts must secede from the United States (preferably alongside California, New York, etc.)

Date: 2007-11-14 06:40 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] q10.livejournal.com
oh, wait, this isn't David Horowitz's ‘Academic Bill of Rights’, is it? the one with maybe half a provision to protect actual freedoms, and about seven provisions reminiscent of the worst excesses of the ‘fairness doctrine’.

if so, then, um, never mind. i interpreted your comments to mean that the rider had something to do with protecting actual expression rights.

Profile

asterroc

April 2017

S M T W T F S
      1
2345678
9101112131415
16171819202122
232425 26272829
30      

Most Popular Tags

Style Credit

Expand Cut Tags

No cut tags
Page generated Dec. 30th, 2025 09:36 pm
Powered by Dreamwidth Studios