More on "His Dark Materials"
Nov. 27th, 2007 07:01 pmHere's a review of the series in the Boston Globe. It definitely contains spoilers, and I'm not sure I agree with the final punchline about exactly what Dust is, but it's worth reading. It focuses on just what about the series mainstream Christianity finds so subversive, and why, in fact, those things are actually pro-religion. Of course, entirely dismissing the fact that Pullman is a self-proclaimed atheist in the process, but still intriguing.
no subject
Date: 2007-11-28 12:07 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2007-11-28 12:08 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2007-11-28 12:24 am (UTC)I honestly didn't like the third book as much, the first two lead me believe it wasn't really anti-religion, the third had me questioning if that really wasn't the case. In the third he takes a number of jabs at the religious establishment, at one point one of the character's describes religion as a "beautiful lie," and goes on about how science was preferable - and that's referring to our world's religion where we we're not under the fascist rule of the Magisterium. Not to mention that every religious character was on the villain's side, or how in hindsight maybe he put in the witches as almost exclusively heroes and daemons to represent a person's soul in an attempt to squick christians. I don't think it's anti-Christian so far to the point where people should skip out on reading it or watching the movies, but I do see where some of the critics are coming from.
(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:no subject
Date: 2007-11-28 02:34 am (UTC)(no subject)
From:no subject
Date: 2007-11-28 06:00 am (UTC)Plus, can't an aetheist write a fantasy novel that is a critique of Catholic Church doctrine rather than a Dawkins-esque materialist polemic? It is, after all, a fantasy novel.
OT, am I the only one disturbed by how young the Lyra actress is, given how the books end?? (and as I understand it, after a fairly short time - not the 7 year span of Harry Potter, for example..)
(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From: