Date: 2013-08-17 04:36 pm (UTC)
I realized looking at the lists of options that I do not think about this, generally, in that kind of specificity. I mean, if someone talks about diameter that also implies radius, and vice versa, right?

What does "physical size" even mean? Given how volume doesn't imply mass and vice versa. D: That /was/ my pick, for what I think, but now I realize I maybe don't know what -I- mean by that. >.<

I confess I rarely think about -mass- when people talk about size/bigness of planets. And so now I'm not sure how to mark the survey. Especially in the "one is bigger" category, since a planet can be bigger in volume but smaller in mass. *cries*

Ambiguous words are ambiguous.

I also haven't finished eating breakfast yet.

ETA: Having now read the other comments, I feel better about being confused/frustrated. I've definitely noticed that if people are talking -mass- (or weight) for an object, generally they make it clear, since in my experience, the only people talking about mass are talking within a scientific context, and so they are specific about that.
This account has disabled anonymous posting.
If you don't have an account you can create one now.
HTML doesn't work in the subject.
More info about formatting

Profile

asterroc

April 2017

S M T W T F S
      1
2345678
9101112131415
16171819202122
232425 26272829
30      

Most Popular Tags

Style Credit

Expand Cut Tags

No cut tags
Page generated Jul. 10th, 2025 01:19 pm
Powered by Dreamwidth Studios