they guy who wrote the last one may himself believe what he's saying, but the fact that he wrote "one's" when he meant "ones" makes it very difficult for me to take him seriously at all.
pluarlizing with apostrophes is a major pet peeve, if you couldn't tell...
Hee. yeah, I only grammar-nazi when someone's trying to win a written argument. It may be an ad hominem attack to listen to the format of presentation more than the actual argument, but it's one that's hard to resist.
His actual argument is weak as well, he only makes a single weak attempt to prove pants==men's clothing, when he talks about bathroom signs. He also associates "Wicca, many false religions, and the occult" with immoral clothing, while from my personal experience these groups are more likely to have women wearing skirts - in hippie clothing! So he'd need to prove that one to me as well if he wants to use it as a vote against pants.
![[identity profile]](https://www.dreamwidth.org/img/silk/identity/openid.png){kind=small}
![[personal profile]](https://www.dreamwidth.org/img/silk/identity/user.png)
timeasmymeasure
no subject
Date: 2006-05-04 09:21 pm (UTC)pluarlizing with apostrophes is a major pet peeve, if you couldn't tell...
no subject
Date: 2006-05-04 09:22 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2006-05-04 09:27 pm (UTC)His actual argument is weak as well, he only makes a single weak attempt to prove pants==men's clothing, when he talks about bathroom signs. He also associates "Wicca, many false religions, and the occult" with immoral clothing, while from my personal experience these groups are more likely to have women wearing skirts - in hippie clothing! So he'd need to prove that one to me as well if he wants to use it as a vote against pants.