Argh!

[asterroc]

#1 - I hate how the article that should've been about the risky self-defense of a child and his dog against a hawk, instead ends up praising nature-bashing. It's not like it's the hawk's fault that daschund puppies are the most plentiful form of prey in the area.

#2 -

There is no substitute for having both a mother and father; it takes a mother and a father to create a child and every child has the right to be raised by a mother and a father. No child should be deprived of these inalienable rights as a matter of public policy. --VoteOnMarriage.org

I'm glad to hear they're planning on voting upon the inalienable right to force single parents to give up their children to married couples who don't want children. It's not right for public policy to deprive every single person of a family consisting of a husband, a wife, 2.5 children, a half a dog, and a third of a cat. I mean, 170,000 people in MA clearly think it's important that we have the whole state vote on exactly how every single family should look and behave, civil rights be damned. [WHDH-TV Channel 7 Boston]

Comments

[l0stmyrel1g10n.livejournal.com]

i don't want to give up two-thirds of my cat :'(

and i know a lesbian who, along with her partner, is raising her kids far better than a whole lot of breeder couples i could name. it makes me so mad that people think gender has anything to do with how well you can raise kids.

[zandperl.livejournal.com]

I should start a movement to ban anyone but opposite-gendered married couples from owning dogs. It makes the same amount of sense.