"Pillow Angel" surgery was illegal
May. 8th, 2007 07:41 pmIt's not often we hear follow-ups on headline news, so I figured I'd bring this one to y'all's attention: the surgery that removed "pillow angel" Ashley's uterus has been determined to have been against the law.
"Washington law specifically prohibits the sterilization of minors with developmental disabilities without zealous advocacy on their behalf and court approval," said Mark Stroh, WPAS [Washington Protection and Advocacy System, a private group vested with federal investigative authority for people with disabilities,] executive director, in a statement. The hospital has apologized and says they'll be more rigorous in the future, including ALL future treatments for Ashley herself. WPAS is not intending to prosecute.
"Washington law specifically prohibits the sterilization of minors with developmental disabilities without zealous advocacy on their behalf and court approval," said Mark Stroh, WPAS [Washington Protection and Advocacy System, a private group vested with federal investigative authority for people with disabilities,] executive director, in a statement. The hospital has apologized and says they'll be more rigorous in the future, including ALL future treatments for Ashley herself. WPAS is not intending to prosecute.
no subject
Date: 2007-05-09 12:41 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2007-05-09 03:27 am (UTC)I don't see the shame or tragedy in dying a child after a very (over-)long and happy childhood.
I'm afraid this last comment will erupt in flamewar, but I'll say it anyway because it's how I feel: this case is no worse than (I'd argue better than, in fact) the spaying and neutering of animals without their consent.
no subject
Date: 2007-05-09 03:00 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2007-05-09 08:02 pm (UTC)