kadath has
a better rant about it, but the House decided to pass a resolution (no real actions, just a statement) stating that Christianity rocks. 372 Representatives passed it, 9 against, 10 abstentions, and 40 didn't vote. Mine was one of the ones voting for -
find and write to your Rep here, and
look up how they voted here, and
modify or copy this no thanks for voting letter, unless of course you wish to write your own.
Subject: H RES 847 - Recognizing the Importance of Christmas and the Christian Faith.
I was sorry to hear of your recent vote in support of House Resolution 847 (Recognizing the Importance of Christmas and the Christian Faith). I live and vote in your district, in $Town$, $State$. I am a Professor of Physics at *** Community College in $Town$, and I earned my Master's degree in Astronomy from $University in Your State$.
I am multi-cultural in background, with a Jewish father and Chinese Christian mother. My family has always valued all cultures and religions, celebrating both Hanukah and Christmas, as well as respecting our ancestors as in traditional Chinese culture. I myself am atheist and believe strongly in the separation of Church and State. As a science educator I find myself concerned whenever religion motivates politics.
I was quite disappointed when I learned that you had voted in support of Christianity and Christmas. I feel it was in particularly poor taste to do so during the celebration of Hanukah, not to mention in light of the increasing phobia of Americans against people of different backgrounds. I take it as a personal attack upon my own beliefs, as well as those of my family members, and am offended that no effort has been made to reach out to different cultures.
I hope that in the future you keep in mind that by legislating official support for Christianity, you are legislating against XX% of the population in $State$, and you are sending a message that those outside the mainstream are not acceptable in this nation. Actions such as these are what lead to other countries' animosity towards the United States. When you meddle together the affairs of the government with religions matters you are going against the wishes of our founding fathers, and taking steps towards repeating tragic historical acts where one religion persecuted people not of that religion and beliefs outside that religion.
Please consider the opinions of your voting constituents when you make decisions such as these in the future.
Sincerely,
Zandperl
no subject
Date: 2007-12-14 02:38 pm (UTC)(FWIW, your first link says search results are only available for a limited amount of time, and your second link isn't one.)
ETA: But so, your point is that recognizing a religion isn't too strange for them, and therefore we should only get pissed on behalf of unrecognized atheists, and possibly at their time-wasting.
no subject
Date: 2007-12-14 05:09 pm (UTC)I guess my point is both that recognizing religion isn't strange, but you're right, they don't recognize atheists, and when they do recognize religions they seem to show biases in what they say about them. I am somewhat pissed that they acknowledged Christianity in sweeping, historical language and only acknowledged Islam by saying "most Muslims aren't terrorists." Also, for Ramadan, they were still just recognizing RAMADAN, whereas for Christmas, they were recognizing CHRISTIANITY itself.