Explain to me: Federal Bank Bailout
Sep. 19th, 2008 08:21 pmOh wise LJ-friends, explain to me this Feds bailing out / buying out the banks thing. Preferably in 3 sentences or less (so as to boil it down to what's most important).
I really do appreciate y'all's ability to boil down these topics I find remarkably complex and filled with too many details for me to grasp, into simple "here's what's important about the thing, and here's what you can ignore" sort of summaries. And I've a tag for them too.
So. Fannie May, Freddie Mac (what's with the names anyway?), and AIG. Three sentences. Go!
I really do appreciate y'all's ability to boil down these topics I find remarkably complex and filled with too many details for me to grasp, into simple "here's what's important about the thing, and here's what you can ignore" sort of summaries. And I've a tag for them too.
So. Fannie May, Freddie Mac (what's with the names anyway?), and AIG. Three sentences. Go!
no subject
Date: 2008-09-20 12:48 am (UTC)That was 4 sentences, and is really simplistic. The ultra simplistic one sentence response is: They had to do it because all of these major financial institutions where going to tank and the US economy was going to resemble the Afghani economy without someone stepping in to stop the losses.
Frannie May and Freddie Mac are government subsidized lenders for student loans and low income mortgages, the government is pretty much obligated to bail them out anyway. Even so it's going to be really hard to get student loans and low income mortgages for awhile. It's going to be a bumpy two years. Keep your 401K contributions at the same rate (they're buying more now and they will adjust as the market corrects itself), but any investments you have that aren't in guaranteed CDs get out of and keep the money in cash in an FDIC insured savings account (if you have more than $100,000, split it into multiple accounts at different banks b/c FDIC only covers 100k).
no subject
Date: 2008-09-20 03:24 am (UTC)Also your icon looks like the inside of a migraine. (Which I say to mean it's cool to see that pattern outside my head and without the accompanying pain, not that it gives me a headache.)
no subject
Date: 2008-09-20 04:21 am (UTC)I don't visualize a migraine as looking like that. In fact I don't think I can associate an image with a migraine. The closest to a visual I could give is a feeling of almost electrical pain in my optic nerves, especially if there is light. I personally find the nausea/vomiting from a full on migraine to be worse than the pain. Then again I'm a chronic pain patient so I'm used to pain (or coping with it at least), and I always have pain meds in my system. Whereas I don't handle vomiting well. And it seems like every time I have severe nausea/vomiting I either have no zofran or i forget I have it. I usually manage to catch a migraine before that starts and I can take action to keep that from happening. But I have been getting migraines a lot more frequently in the past year (from 2-3/yr to about once a month, including two that totally incapacitated me for a period, one of which I nearly went to the ER over because the nausea was SO bad. I probably should have because I was so weakened from vomiting all damned night. And a shot of zofran or phenergan and IV fluids would have taken care of that nicely.)
I'm glad you found my summary useful.
no subject
Date: 2008-09-20 04:00 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2008-09-20 09:38 pm (UTC)What I was saying was that the chain collapse of large financial institutions would create a panic among investors, leading to a loss of market confidence, and a downward spiral of the stock market in general. That is why the government had to step in, to halt a chain reaction. Some major players have already been brought down. And more would follow w/o a government intervention. Hopefully the SEC will make new rules to keep this from happening.
I personally blame out of control oil speculation for being a major part of this starting, it shifted the economic balance further than it could go.