[personal profile] asterroc
I tried out some IR photography this weekend (after a post on UV photography by [livejournal.com profile] txtriffidranch the other day). In the sequences below the cut, I have three images: normal visible light (technically, representative false color), a black and white version of the visible light image, and an IR black and white version. (I used an IR filter which blocked out all but the reddest of visible light and of course didn't block IR. Digicams are sensitive to a bit of the IR spectrum, so it sensed both the red and the IR and that became the image). If you want more explanation of the phenomena, I posted on my science blog about it.


From top of Mt. Holyoke, Skinner State Park, looking southwest.
P1050656
P1050655
IR

Communications shack atop Mt. Skinner
P1050647P1050646IR

Date: 2008-10-13 08:06 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] zandperl.livejournal.com
I guess that means that both the red and blue sensitive pixels are also sensitive in IR. I'm a bit surprised.

FWIW it's my understanding that commercially available digicams generally don't use CCD technology, but CMOS. I'm not too clear about the distinction between the two, though I'm under the impression that until recently CCDs were preferred for astronomical use. I'm planning to grill a couple astronomer friends of mine about it, but if you know more than Wikipedia says I'd love to hear.

Profile

asterroc

April 2017

S M T W T F S
      1
2345678
9101112131415
16171819202122
232425 26272829
30      

Most Popular Tags

Style Credit

Expand Cut Tags

No cut tags
Page generated Dec. 25th, 2025 09:58 am
Powered by Dreamwidth Studios