(no subject)
Jan. 27th, 2009 12:26 pm![[personal profile]](https://www.dreamwidth.org/img/silk/identity/user.png)
Dear Charity to which I sent a donation,
Thank you for your considerate letter of appreciation. For future reference I see no need for you to waste either monetary resources or the resources of the Earth doing so, but it was thoughtful of you and I will understand if it helps most donators to continue donating. Also for future reference, you know what shows your appreciation even more than sending a thank-you card? Spelling my name right.
Love,
Zandperl
Thank you for your considerate letter of appreciation. For future reference I see no need for you to waste either monetary resources or the resources of the Earth doing so, but it was thoughtful of you and I will understand if it helps most donators to continue donating. Also for future reference, you know what shows your appreciation even more than sending a thank-you card? Spelling my name right.
Love,
Zandperl
no subject
Date: 2009-01-27 05:35 pm (UTC)The thank you letter I liked best was from Donors Choose -- for helping school teachers get resources. I got a set of letters from the students, bad penmanship and spelling and all :) .
(Um, donators --> donors?)
no subject
Date: 2009-01-27 06:05 pm (UTC)Heh, yeah, I knew the word was wrong but couldn't find the right one at the time. :-P
no subject
Date: 2009-01-27 05:55 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2009-01-27 06:08 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2009-01-27 09:55 pm (UTC)I know for a fact (having run a small theatre company for a few years) that there's an amount above which a formal receipt (which is often written in the form of a thank-you note, on letterhead &c.) is required; I just couldn't remember off the top of my head if the number is $25. I'm pretty sure, having thought more on it, that that's the amount at which an organization has to claim where the donation was from – as opposed to, say, five bucks left in a donation jar – and that it's actually $100 at which the organization is required to write a receipt.
(Of course, I could just look this up, but I'm feeling lazy right now. ;p )
no subject
Date: 2009-01-27 09:57 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2009-01-27 10:03 pm (UTC)I know that when we've received donations online, the receipts have still been via physical mail. (We are incorporated and are a fiscally sponsored member of an arts not-for-profit umbrella organization, but aren't a not-for-profit in our own right (although we're in the process of considering whether or not that would be a good step for us to take). So, I know some of this stuff – all that I've needed to know so far – but not all of it.)
no subject
Date: 2009-01-27 06:16 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2009-01-27 06:25 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2009-01-27 06:31 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2009-01-27 06:47 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2009-01-27 06:52 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2009-01-27 06:27 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2009-01-27 07:04 pm (UTC)We always know when Nick get's spam mail, because he goes by his middle name, and his first name is not an unusual name but lacks one letter of its "typical" spelling.
Then again, I take time to thank people when they pronounce my name correctly on the first try - it happens so rarely.
no subject
Date: 2009-01-27 07:24 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2009-01-27 10:59 pm (UTC)Email requests are annoying but at least they don't waste resources quite so badly.
I should make a resolution to contact them and at least try to convince them not to ask me for any more money in a non-electronic format. I'm lazy about stuff like that.