Censorship
Feb. 7th, 2006 08:11 am![[personal profile]](https://www.dreamwidth.org/img/silk/identity/user.png)
Surprisingly, CNN is covering international news lately - the riots over cartoons of Mohammed. This issue pits the cultural sensitivities of Islam and their definition of capital crime (blasphemy), against the Western ideal of free speech. Most intersting I think are the non-violent reactions.
For example, "CNN has chosen to not show the cartoons out of respect for Islam." Are they being respectful, or self-censoring? Are they just doing it so their reporters in the Middle East don't get killed? And
I'm really curious to see our reactions to this. I expect we'll (US people who care) be incensed and pissed off, but not to the point of violence. Non-violent protest and all that (thank you, Dr. King). I wonder how Israel will react though.
ETA: Some of the comments are hiliariously offensive! Don't read at work if you work for the ACLU or Anti-Defamation League. Hopefully this warning here nicely skirts the line of not-censorship, but sensitive-to-people's-feelings. Feel free to discuss why it really is censorship or is not sensitive, too. :-P
For example, "CNN has chosen to not show the cartoons out of respect for Islam." Are they being respectful, or self-censoring? Are they just doing it so their reporters in the Middle East don't get killed? And
A prominent Iranian newspaper says it is going to hold a competition for cartoons on the Holocaust to test whether the West will apply the principle of freedom of expression to the Nazi genocide against Jews as it did to the caricatures of the Prophet Mohammed.
...
Hamshahri invited foreign cartoonists to enter the competition and said it wanted to see how open the West was to caricatures of the Holocaust.
"Does the West extend freedom of expression to the crimes committed by the United States and Israel, or an event such as the Holocaust? Or is its freedom only for insulting religious sanctities?" Hamshahri wrote, referring to the Prophet Mohammed cartoons, in a short article on its back page.
I'm really curious to see our reactions to this. I expect we'll (US people who care) be incensed and pissed off, but not to the point of violence. Non-violent protest and all that (thank you, Dr. King). I wonder how Israel will react though.
ETA: Some of the comments are hiliariously offensive! Don't read at work if you work for the ACLU or Anti-Defamation League. Hopefully this warning here nicely skirts the line of not-censorship, but sensitive-to-people's-feelings. Feel free to discuss why it really is censorship or is not sensitive, too. :-P
no subject
Date: 2006-02-07 06:53 am (UTC)I heard it from an Israeli so it's ok to repeat it.
Date: 2006-02-07 07:30 pm (UTC)"Hey," says the second boy, "YOU LEAVE MY PARENTS OUT OF THIS!"
Oh My God.
Date: 2006-02-07 07:40 pm (UTC)Re: I heard it from an Israeli so it's ok to repeat it.
Date: 2006-02-07 08:12 pm (UTC)I'm sure you've heard it:
Q: How many jews can you fit in a car?
A: 2 in the front, 3 in the back, and 6 million in the ashtray.
Re: I heard it from an Israeli so it's ok to repeat it.
Date: 2006-02-07 08:23 pm (UTC)BabyJew Jokes. But now that they're here, I'm not gonna stop you, just groan in pain with each one. :-PRe: I heard it from an Israeli so it's ok to repeat it.
Date: 2006-02-07 08:28 pm (UTC)Jokes
Date: 2006-02-07 08:33 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2006-02-07 07:44 pm (UTC)Meanwhile, I find it interesting that there's been so much furor over "just a cartoon." Lots of people diminish cartoons/comics as a medium of expression, classifying them lower than both "art" and "literature," of which comics are composed. 1+1=0? Some of the most powerful things I've read were comics.
no subject
Date: 2006-02-07 08:19 pm (UTC)Mohammed was also a military leader, while Christ was a pacifist. Mohammed led his followers on the first Jihad, it wasn't until after Christ's death that his followers went to war in his name.
no subject
Date: 2006-02-07 08:21 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2006-02-07 08:41 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2006-02-07 09:52 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2006-02-08 05:50 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2006-02-08 04:36 am (UTC)The fact that one is a historical event and the other is an ancient religious leader doesn't make much of a difference when you take the relative fundamentalism/secularism of the cultures into account.
So a homosexual aborted fetus walks into a gas chamber...
Date: 2006-02-07 07:44 pm (UTC)When it's time for Jack Chick to be judged, he stands before Christ and Christ looks him over. "Well," says Christ, "nobody really likes you, but you DID accept me as your lord and Savior, so I guess you're okay."
Chick naturally starts praising Christ's forgiveness and mercy. When he's done jumping up and down and speaking in tongues, he asks Jesus, "Lord, can you answer me a question?"
"Certainly," said Jesus.
"Well," says Jack Chick, "World War II was pretty bad. We were pretty sure that you were going to come around then. But you didn't. And then there was all that trouble with Israel, and we all thought it was going to be a sign of your impending return, but you never showed up. Finally in the early 21st Century I developed this whole theory about Israel, the Pope, and various natural disasters, and us evangelicals were all SO SURE you were right around the corner. But you didn't show up then either. How come you took so long?"
"Well," said Jesus, "the first time I was down here I had a really nice childhood, and I figured I'd try that again while I still could. So I thought it would be a good idea to come to a virgin who knew no sin."
"Ah, I see," said Jack Chick. "So you had to wait until you grew up?"
"No," said Jesus, "that's not the problem. Thing is, I kept getting aborted!"