[personal profile] asterroc
Apparently the Tea Party supports Governor Walker's union busting. I don't get this at all. I thought the Tea Party was a conservative libertarian group. Shouldn't they resent the government interfering with and attempting to regulate how workers interact with employers? Or is their fiscal conservatism trumping their libertarianism?

Date: 2011-02-22 06:04 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] q10.livejournal.com
the wage-garnishing thing is pretty huge, though. more generally, there are, as i understand it, a lot of regulations constraining both sides of employer-union negotiations - it's not like you're just talking about two (for-profit or non-profit) corporations sitting down for a chat - there are detailed regulations about what each side can and can't threaten.

Date: 2011-02-22 06:17 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] zandperl.livejournal.com
the wage-garnishing thing is pretty huge, though.

You're right.

there are detailed regulations about what each side can and can't threaten.

I thought most of those things are not specific to union workplaces though? Public employees are not allowed to strike in some states (technically, striking is not a protected act), but this applies to both unionized and non-unionized public employees (for example, the part-time lab techs in my department are not unionized). Non-retaliation laws apply not only to employers retaliating against employees for union activities, but also to employers retaliating against whistle-blowers (for safety, for discrimination, etc.).

Profile

asterroc

April 2017

S M T W T F S
      1
2345678
9101112131415
16171819202122
232425 26272829
30      

Most Popular Tags

Style Credit

Expand Cut Tags

No cut tags
Page generated Jan. 5th, 2026 09:06 am
Powered by Dreamwidth Studios