[personal profile] asterroc
The Large Hadron Collidor goes online today! This is as exciting as the day Hubble opened its shutters May 20 1990.

Even a lot of sciencey people I know have been asking about what the LHC is, and why the doomsayers are wrong, so here's a little summary of it. Particle accelerators (as is the LHC) are devices that smash things together to find out what's inside them. It's somewhat like if we wanted to learn how cars work, so we did head-on crash tests. While the analogy isn't perfect (no analogy ever is), there are some similarities. For example, while head-on crashes in real life are dangerous, crash tests are completely controlled and are entirely safe. Particle accelerators let us learn about what's going on inside small particles. Older lower energy ones smashed together "normal" particles like electrons and protons and helped us to learn that those are made of quarks. The LHC is a high energy one and we'll be smashing together another type of particle called a hadron, and it will help us learn how the entire universe works, for example gravity and dark matter.

The woo-hoos (aka tinfoil hat wearers) have been saying doom and gloom about the LHC, claiming that the high energy levels will either rip a hole in the entire universe, or else create a black hole that will swallow the Earth. Well, there's really no reason to worry at all. First off, we only call the LHC "high energy" by comparison - it's higher energy than anything people have been able to do before now. However, much higher energy collisions take place every second as cosmic rays hit the Earth's atmosphere. The main difference is that in the LHC these collisions are controlled. As I said to a biologist in another community, being afraid of that is kinda like if people were afraid of scientists culturing e.coli - it happens in the wild, after all, and that's not scary at all.

Date: 2008-09-09 05:48 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] zandperl.livejournal.com
Do you guys get a special grant writing course in grad school or something?

I wish. Many colleges have grant writers just for such purposes. However they don't often "get" science, so I doubt most science faculty use them. They probably just muddle along on their own, or with mentorship.

Now, it'd be an interesting debate whether the LHC or HST was a bigger waste better use of taxpayer dollars...

Date: 2008-09-09 06:04 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] marquiswildbill.livejournal.com
I actually knew someone who was a grant writer specifically for the sciences. Forget which school (we have a quite few of them in this area) he was at.
I'm just in awe of how much money gets spent on projects like the LHC (well every particle accelerator). Yet PPPL has almost been killed several times.
I'd say that it remains to be seen which gets more bang for its buck in terms of LHC vs HST. HST was a great ad campaign for NASA and for getting the general population interested in science. Hopefully LHC can do the same at least. I just wonder what kind of chem facility could be built for the same money.
So we now know that learning about hadrons is more important to politicians than curing a major disease (certainly feasible in a few years /w LHC's budget).

Profile

asterroc

April 2017

S M T W T F S
      1
2345678
9101112131415
16171819202122
232425 26272829
30      

Most Popular Tags

Style Credit

Expand Cut Tags

No cut tags
Page generated Dec. 31st, 2025 10:59 pm
Powered by Dreamwidth Studios